File /Humanist.vol22.txt, message 24


Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 06:59:29 +0100
From: "Humanist Discussion Group \(by way of Willard McCarty              <willard.mccarty-AT-kcl.ac.uk>\)" <willard-AT-LISTS.VILLAGE.VIRGINIA.EDU>
Subject: 22.024 literary critics: survive by embracing science
To: <humanist-AT-Princeton.EDU>


                Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 22, No. 24.
       Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
  www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/humanities/cch/research/publications/humanist.html
                        www.princeton.edu/humanist/
                     Submit to: humanist-AT-princeton.edu



         Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 06:46:23 +0100
         From: Matthew Jockers <mjockers-AT-stanford.edu>
         Subject: embracing science?

Subscribers to Humanist will find this article of interest:
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/05/11/measure_for_measure/
<snip>
"Measure for Measure: Literary criticism could be one of our best
tools for understanding
the human condition. But first, it needs a radical change: embracing science"
</snip>
Boston Globe for 11 May 2008
--
Matthew Jockers
Stanford University

   

Humanist Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005