File /Humanist.vol22.txt, message 375


From: Humanist Discussion Group <willard.mccarty-AT-mccarty.org.uk>
To: humanist-AT-lists.digitalhumanities.org
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:28:04 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [Humanist]  22.379 how different subjects are different



                 Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 22, No. 379.
         Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                       www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist
                Submit to: humanist-AT-lists.digitalhumanities.org



        Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:25:52 +0000
        From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty-AT-mccarty.org.uk>
        Subject: how different subjects are different

Those here with interests in interdisciplinarity and so how different 
disciplines go about their business differently will value a recent 
article by the Nobel Laureate Roald Hoffmann, "What might philosophy of 
science look like if chemists built it?", Synthese 155.3 (April 2007): 
321-36. Also his book, The Same and Not the Same (Columbia University 
Press, 1995), Part II: "The way it is told", is worth looking at. One of 
the valuable aspects of both is his argument concerning the reductionism 
characteristic of 20C physics.

Yours,
WM
-- 
Willard McCarty, Professor of Humanities Computing,
King's College London, staff.cch.kcl.ac.uk/~wmccarty/;
Editor, Humanist, www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist;
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, www.isr-journal.org.



_______________________________________________
List posts to: humanist-AT-lists.digitalhumanities.org
List info and archives at at: http://digitalhumanities.org/humanist
Listmember interface at: http://digitalhumanities.org/humanist/Restricted/listmember_interface.php
Subscribe at: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist/membership_form.php




   

Humanist Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005