File /Humanist.vol22.txt, message 714


From: Humanist Discussion Group <willard.mccarty-AT-mccarty.org.uk>
To: humanist-AT-lists.digitalhumanities.org
Date: Sun,  3 May 2009 06:19:14 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [Humanist]  22.730 controlled vocabularies


                 Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 22, No. 730.
         Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                       www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist
                Submit to: humanist-AT-lists.digitalhumanities.org



        Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 16:47:43 -0500
        From: John Laudun <jlaudun-AT-mac.com>
        Subject: Re: controlled vocabularies?


On 2009-05-02, at 01:04 , Humanist Discussion Group wrote:

> I'm trying to ascertain the existence of specific controlled  
> vocabularies in
> the humanities and social sciences (and/or fields therein).  I'm
> particularly interested in those used with institutional  
> repositories, if
> they exist.  If you know of controlled vocabularies that are widely  
> accepted
> and used in the relevant fields outside of IRs (in journals, for  
> example),
> I'd appreciate pointers to those too.

Folklorists have something like this with the Ethnographic Thesaurus.  
You can find it on the website of the American Folklore Society:

http://et.afsnet.org/

--
John Laudun
Department of English
University of Louisiana – Lafayette
Lafayette, LA 70504-4691
337-482-5493
laudun-AT-louisiana.edu
http://johnlaudun.org/
ResearcherID: A-5742-2009
Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: johnlaudun



_______________________________________________
List posts to: humanist-AT-lists.digitalhumanities.org
List info and archives at at: http://digitalhumanities.org/humanist
Listmember interface at: http://digitalhumanities.org/humanist/Restricted/listmember_interface.php
Subscribe at: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist/membership_form.php


   

Humanist Main Page

 

Display software: ArchTracker © Malgosia Askanas, 2000-2005